EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001553_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Sat Oct 28 10:34:18 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA134081658; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 10:34:18 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail02.mail.aol.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA134021654; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 10:34:14 -0700
Received: by mail02.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA00764; Sat, 28 Oct 1995 13:27:25 -0400
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 13:27:25 -0400
From: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: GLOW and FIELD RENDERING QUESTION
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In a message dated 95-10-28 00:11:08 EDT, you write:

>Not true.  For both field rendering and motion blur, LW works at time
>steps that are smaller than the frame rate, so there *is* time for non-
>linear interpolation to happen.
>
>Note, though, that when Linear is turned on for a pair of keyframes one
>frame apart, this tells LW to do *no* interpolation, not even linear.
>It's a special case, for the precise purpose of allowing you to create
>instantaneous (discontinuous) changes, even though the interface only
>gives you access to frame-rate time resolution.
>
>

It is true if you are not field rendering or motion blurring. Unless the
software has changed at 4.0. Since I don't have a list of the changes I can't
be sure. Do you know if this is the case. I would not want to mis-inform
anyone and if I have, my apologies.

Tom Rennen
Intelligent Light Digital Imaging
214-420-6815
--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]